Meryl Streep's speech last night

[adamgreer]

Unless you've been living under a rock, you've heard about her blistering rebuttal to the Cheeto, without ever actually mentioning his name.  A brilliant speech, a wonderful call to arms.  

The "President Elect," of course, because he has nothing more important to worry about, had to take to twitter to complain, referring to Meryl as "overrated" (a 30 time nominee is overrated...ok sure!) which is probably one of the funniest things I've read all week. 

http://ew.com/awards/2017/01/08/golden-globes-2017-meryl-streep/

[ErikJ972]

Meryl Streep is a National treasure. Donald Trump is a National embarassment.

[madbrian]

Worth noting Viola Davis's impassioned introduction.

[Jane2]

I don't typically appreciate actors using their acceptance speeches to wax political, but Trump is so heinous, and I hate him so much, that I applaud Streep.

[TheGingerBreadMan]

Such a class act. I have so much respect for this woman, both as an actress and as a person. She spoke with honesty, power, and dignity. I applaud her.  

[adamgreer]

Our hard at work "President Elect," focusing on the big issues:

[Auggie27]

Missing in a lot of the hyperbolic coverage: Her speech artfully, poignantly cataloged the "origin stories" of so many actors in the room, creating a tapestry that elegantly explained how Hollywood is a melting pot of individuals of differing backgrounds and demographics. Her address to those honoring her was in celebration of the artist's journey toward finding -- and creating -- community. Her thesis and its timeliness were decidedly relevant, as actual members of the Globes in-room audience symbolize our open doors and hearts. To me she wasn't political; she was American, her message as clear as the words of Emma Lazarus on the Statue of Liberty. Count me among those who are grateful.

[Gorlois]

It was an inspiring speech.

[Petralicious]

Yeah Trumps a dope but she gave the rapist of a child a standing ovation. But hey Hollywood Rules!

(1:10)

 

 

[madbrian]

Auggie27 said: "Missing in a lot of the hyperbolic coverage: Her speech artfully, poignantly cataloged the "origin stories" of so many actors in the room, creating a tapestry that elegantly explained how Hollywood is a melting pot of individuals of differing backgrounds and demographics. Her address to those honoring her was in celebration of the artist's journey toward finding -- and creating -- community. Her thesis and its timeliness were decidedly relevant, as actual members of the Globes in-room audience symbolize our open doors and hearts. To me she wasn't political; she was American, her message as clear as the words of Emma Lazarus on the Statue of Liberty. Count me among those who are grateful."

Very well put.

[After Eight]

The obnoxious, egomaniacal, presumptuous arrogance of these people.

They never stop.

And no doubt never will.

[Mildred Plotka]

You're a Trump sympathizer. I'm Shocked!  

[Kad]

Make America Eight Again.

[ErikJ972]

After Eight said: "The obnoxious, egomaniacal, presumptuous arrogance of these people.

They never stop.

And no doubt never will."

It's like you're talking about yourself!

[After Eight]

Mildred,

I'm a humility sympathizer.

Now look up the meaning of the word.

 

 

[ErikJ972]

He says humbly. 

[BroadwayConcierge]

What was the point of the speech other than providing more flowery rhetoric instead of actual action? The election is done...

[Kad]

Taking advantage of a public platform to speak on the necessity of protecting the arts and free press is an action.

[Jay Lerner-Z]

...yeah, but the consequences are only just starting. Any dolt can understand that, surely.

[After Eight]

^

 

The point?

Smug, self-serving, ego-gratification. Bolstered only further by the plaudits from those of similar stripe.

 

 

[BroadwayConcierge]

I mean, sure, I guess. But Trump hasn't even entered office yet. Moreover, I think it's safe to say that the narrative of Hollywood liberal elitism played at least somewhat of a role in frustrating swaths of the electorate to the point of Hillary losing votes. So why keep doing it instead of just doing your job sans political commentary?

[Adair Haywind]

Hey Rob, can you please ban all of the Trump supporters and sympathizers on this board?

[BroadwayConcierge]

Adair Haywind said: "Hey Rob, can you please ban all of the Trump supporters and sympathizers on this board?"

That's nice. Tolerance toward all—except those with whom you disagree.

 

[Kad]

BroadwayConcierge said: "I mean, sure, I guess. But Trump hasn't even entered office yet. Moreover, I think it's safe to say that the narrative of Hollywood liberal elitism played at least somewhat of a role in frustrating swaths of the electorate to the point of Hillary losing votes. So why keep doing it instead of just doing your job sans political commentary?"

Please explain to me why you think actors/entertainers should not speak out on sociopolitical issues.

[BroadwayConcierge]

Because...they're...actors? And not politicians? I go to the movies and see shows to see these talented people do their craft. I don't give a hoot what their politics are. I'm not alone in this—if Americans actually gave a crap about celebrities' politics, Hillary would be our president-elect. 

[BroadwayConcierge]

(Double post, my mistake)