In honor of the play's 25th anniversary, Slate has put together a wonderful, insightful piece about the development of Angels in America, from its inception onward. Extremely worthwhile reading, put together by interviews with Tony Kushner, Oskar Eustis, and dozens of other people who have been involved with productions of the piece over the last two and a half decades.
I read it yesterday. It is mind-blowingly great-for what it is, as much as the plays themselves. For those of us for whom Angels is a seminal work defining what theatre is and should be, it is absolutely essential reading.
It really made me want to see a full book done, not unlike Kenneth Turan's wonderful oral history of Joe Papp & the Public (Free for All) that came out several years ago. Even at this length, it feels like skimming the surface of the story of the development of Angels.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
I have only seen Part I of AIA, but I'm not sure I fully understand what was "real" and what was "imaginary." Maybe that was part of the point.
Also, despite the humorous moments, I remember the play as an extreme downer. The short nude scene (absolutely integral to the story, in my opinion) was something I will probably never get out of my mind. I believe it symbolizes the dehumanization of an AIDS patient in that the actor stands on stage naked as another character pokes his scrotum in full view of the audience. My hat goes off to the accomplished actors who can not only perform the scene without breaking character, but who have the courage to play Prior Walter in the first place.
Kad, thanks for posting it was a fascinating read. I was very lucky to see it on Broadway ( came from Australia ) and the sense of excitement in that theatre before Act one started was like nothing I have ever felt.
It was ground breaking, heart breaking, thrilling and last but not least life affirming.
Lets hope the Mark Tamper revisits it for its 25th anniversary
Well I didn't want to get into it, but he's a Satanist.
Every full moon he sacrifices 4 puppies to the Dark Lord and smears their blood on his paino.
This should help you understand the score for Wicked a little bit more.
Tazber's: Reply to
Is Stephen Schwartz a Practicing Christian