Break a leg tonite, SHUFFLE! Because of you, I have happily done tons of reading and research on various people and subjects developed in this production. Even, if some on this thread consider this production not perfect, I, for one, applaud the obvious ambition and artistic aspirations of this piece! Have to say I loved it, but that was wks ago, and I will be working there, FOH, on Sat nite, so very curious 'regarding the "improvements ".
I'm "TINY"aka TheTinyMagic.
BWW log on problems forever. Yeesh.
I really hope this does well critically. I understand the imperfections of the show, and yet I still think it's daring and is more ambitious than almost anything I've ever seen on Broadway. There's terrific work that's been done on this show, and it deserves to be recognized.
I am a firm believer in serendipity- all the random pieces coming together in one wonderful moment, when suddenly you see what their purpose was all along.
I'm seeing "Shuffle" and "SOR" in 2 weeks and am so excited about it. I respect the opinions of several of my "friends" on BWW and can't wait to see Shuffle! I almost don't want to read any more reviews and just enjoy it for myself. I'm still in awe and amazed they got this incredible cast in one production! Everyone Break A Leg!
LA Times ""Shuffle Along" is, after "Hamilton," the second best new musical of the Broadway year. But it's not the kind of show that will likely enjoy an especially vibrant afterlife. What Wolfe has created is wholly dependent on the magnificent company he has assembled here."
"The first half of George C. Wolfe's "Shuffle Along" is to 2016 what "Hamilton" was to 2015: It's the musical you've got to see, even if you've got to hock your Maserati to pay for the ticket. The cast, led by Audra McDonald, Brian Stokes Mitchell and Billy Porter, is as charismatic as you'd expect, and Savion Glover's near-nonstop choreography explodes off the stage with the unrelenting impact of a flamethrower."-WSJ
What a pull quote. Glad it's getting some solid reviews (and unfortunately some not so nice ones.)
That seems to be the consensus on this board as well. I remember Sondheim's book saying that most musicals had a fantastic act One, because they poured all of their energy into fixing that, and not on Act Two. That must have been what happened here. I also think it probably should have had a tryout, but I think it's a great musical and hope it does well!