Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits it's reception category
Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits it's reception category
Hamilton22
Broadway Star Joined: 7/18/15
#1Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits it's reception category
Posted: 11/27/15 at 9:10pm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finding_Neverland_(musical)
Is it just me or is that pretty strange?
#2Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits it's reception category
Posted: 11/27/15 at 9:13pm
I also find it strange it only gives a brief sentence about the curve production. Do you think Harvey has his hands on it?
In our millions, in our billions, we are most powerful when we stand together. TW4C unwaveringly joins the worldwide masses, for we know our liberation is inseparably bound.
Signed,
Theater Workers for a Ceasefire
https://theaterworkersforaceasefire.com/statement
Updated On: 11/27/15 at 09:13 PM
c0113g3b0y
Leading Actor Joined: 9/16/15
#3Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits it's reception category
Posted: 11/27/15 at 9:16pm
it;s either the work of Weinsten's PR team, Diane Paulus (herself) or an overprotective Matthew Morrison fangirl 
The thing is, besides being an utter toad of a human being, Riedel usually has the least knowledge of the topic in the room. He doesn't usually understand the content or approach of a show, and is always completely and unfailingly socially ignorant, which makes it really infuriating when Susan can't get a word in edgewise. A definitive mansplainer; it's always painful when he has female guests. I watch the show sporadically when I really want to see a guest, because it's the only theatre talkshow we have, but it would be so much better without this hateful clown in a dadcoat. (thanks ScaryWarhol)
Hamilton22
Broadway Star Joined: 7/18/15
#4Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits it's reception category
Posted: 11/27/15 at 9:20pm
It's got to be Weinstein. Its always him.
chewy5000
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/1/09
#5Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits it's reception category
Posted: 11/27/15 at 11:31pm
Looking at the page history, it's something that's never existed, which isn't unusual. There's no evidence for unflattering information being deliberately removed because it was never written to begin with.As much as I love conspiracy theories, there's nothing sinister going on here.
#6Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits it's reception category
Posted: 11/27/15 at 11:46pm
Most musicals' wiki pages are barren at best, especially newer ones. This is no breaking news.
Keeping BroadwayWorld Illustrated
Imelsa Staunton
Swing Joined: 11/28/15
#7Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits it's reception category
Posted: 11/28/15 at 1:08am
I heard it was an evil god in mexico doing this stuff.
#8Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits its reception category
Posted: 11/28/15 at 1:16am
It's not that strange.
Please fix your damn "its."
"This thread reads like a series of White House memos." — Mister Matt
Sunny11
Broadway Star Joined: 9/3/14
#9Finding Neverland's wikipedia page omits its reception category
Posted: 11/28/15 at 1:33am
"Reception" usually includes box office which FN Is doing fine at. Most of the professional reviews gave complementary notices to the actors. Awards wise they where nominated for drama desk and drama league and those fan voted ones from this site and the audience choice awards. It's not all ' bad' that it needs to be hidden from view.
