I think the logo artwork might look better with a promotional image of Raul, or the cast or something. Alone, it looks too plain but better than the original from their pre-Broadway run.
"Groundbreaking", "Original", "Creative" "Has To Be Seen To Be Believed", "Dazzling", "I Was Brought To Tears"....jus bein silly....Did one of the producer's children do it? More bad artwork on the St. James marquee.
Oy vey, brody123, you're not kidding. The production team needs to take a big leap of faith with a decent designer. The website barely looks like a homemade draft.
I am in shock over the website. I could code the same website. I'm self taught and haven't coded anything in years.
"I never had theatre producers run after me. Some people want to make more Broadway shows out of movies. But Elliot and I aren't going to do Batman: The Musical." - Julie Taymor 1999
I love Raul Esparza and think he's one of the great talents of today's theatre. That being said, I doubt that his name alone is going to send the out-of-towners rushing to their phones to get tickets. It's got to be something more provocative -- and colorful. The way it looks now, you'd think it was some ponderous drama.
You need double the artwork and half the fonts. How does this symbolize anything? "Mirror Ball" says Studio 54 at best and Sarah Maclachlan at least. It's been over 10 years since I've seen the movie, but the only sparkly bit I remember were the sequins. Mirror balls are not sequins. Also, what's with all the different typography?
Call me.
www.listenterprises.com
"Are we being attacked or entertained?" - MST3K
My theatre poster/logo portfolio: http://www.listenterprises.com/
"Mirror Ball" says Studio 54 at best and Sarah Maclachlan at least. It's been over 10 years since I've seen the movie, but the only sparkly bit I remember were the sequins. "
It's interesting how people see things differently. Rather than think about a disco ball, I saw it as "surface glitz" and "phony" which is what Nightengale was.
Really, is it any worse than the Jesus Christ Superstar non-artwork? Advertising is dreadful recently. The Stickfly ad is horrible and I would bet does more to push people away than bring them in. One A Clear Day... made the musical look like a concert and then, with the addition of Ms. Mueller, like a bad high school art project. Lysistrata Jones was cute but made the show look like a high school production. What is going on?
In all fairness, the jacket they used in the LA production was made of largish square mirrors that look far more like a disco ball than sequins. But the jacket is three-dimensional. It doesn't translate to flat art.
And what on earth is anyone going to get about the show from that artwork? Honestly, the more I looked at the font for Raul's name, the more it reminded me of Superman. Now, I love Raul to death, but "man of steel", really?
The whole thing just looks....dreary, along with what most everyone else said here so far.